-
1 admit the truth of the story
Общая лексика: признавать достоверность рассказаУниверсальный англо-русский словарь > admit the truth of the story
-
2 admit
[ədʹmıt] v1. 1) признавать, допускатьI admit it to be true - я признаю /допускаю/, что это правда /что это так/
you must admit that he is right - вы должны признать, что он прав
this, I admit, was wrong - это, надо признаться, было неверно
it is generally admitted that... - общепризнанно /общеизвестно/, что...
to admit (to) stealing - сознаться /признаться/ в краже
2. 1) впускать; допускатьto admit smb. into the house - впустить кого-л. в дом
to admit to /into/ college [school, club] - принять в колледж [школу, клуб]
he was admitted to the hospital suffering from burns - его взяли в больницу с ожогами
he was never admitted into my confidence - он никогда не пользовался моим доверием
windows admit light and air to the room - через окна в комнату поступают свет и свежий воздух
2) давать право на входthe ticket admits one - это билет на одно лицо, по этому билету может пройти один человек
3) (to) принимать в члены ( организации)4) давать допуск; предоставлять право на должность или на привилегии3. вмещать (обыкн. о помещении)the garage door admits two cars abreast - в этот гараж могут въехать сразу два автомобиля
the harbour admits large liners and cargo boats - гавань может принимать пассажирские лайнеры и грузовые суда
4. книжн. (of) допускать, позволятьthe words admit of no other interpretation - эти слова не допускают иного толкования
-
3 admit
1. v признавать, допускатьI admit it to be true — я признаю, что это правда
you must admit that he is right — вы должны признать, что он прав
to admit a claim — признавать претензию, требование
2. v признавать; признаваться, сознаваться3. v впускать; допускать4. v давать право на входthe ticket admits one — это билет на одно лицо, по этому билету может пройти один человек
5. v принимать в члены6. v давать допуск; предоставлять право на должность или на привилегии7. v вмещать8. v книжн. допускать, позволятьСинонимический ряд:1. accept (verb) accept; receive; take; take in2. acknowledge (verb) acknowledge; agree; avow; bare; confess; declare; disclose; divulge; fess up; hold; let on; own; own up; own up to; recognise; recognize3. allow to enter (verb) afford access to; allow to enter; entertain; give access; grant admittance; grant entrance to; let in; permit entrance; welcome4. enter (verb) enter; introduce5. permit (verb) agree to; allow; assent; bear; concede; grant; let; permitАнтонимический ряд:deny; disallow; disavow; discharge; dismiss; disown; dispute; dissent; eject; exclude; expel; oust; refuse -
4 admit
ədˈmɪt гл.
1) допускать, соглашаться to admit oneself beaten ≈ признавать себя побежденным This, I admit, is true. ≈ Допускаю, что это верно. You must admit her statement to be doubtful. ≈ Вы должны согласиться с тем, что ее заявление не вызывает доверия. Syn: acknowledge
2) признавать (вину), признаваться, сознаваться (тж. to) The accused admitted his guilt to the police. ≈ Обвиняемый признал свою вину. He admitted to his complicity in the crime. ≈ На суде он признался в соучастии в преступлении. The boy admitted to stealing the apples. ≈ Мальчик сознался в краже яблок. The employee admitted stealing the money. ≈ Служащий признался в краже денег. The clerk admitted (to the police) that he had taken the jewels. ≈ Служащий признался, что именно он украл драгоценности. Syn: confess
1)
3) допускать;
принимать to be admitted to the bar ≈ получить право адвокатской практики в суде She was admitted to the university. ≈ Ее приняли в университет. Only 100 boys are admitted to this school every year. ≈ В эту школу ежегодно принимают только сто мальчиков.
4) впускать to admit light( air, water, etc.) ≈ пропускать свет (воздух, воду и т. п.) The key admits to the house. ≈ При помощи ключа можно проникнуть в дом. The manager admitted him to the theater. ≈ Администратор пропустил его в театр. The old man opened the door and admitted me. ≈ Старик открыл дверь и впустил меня.
5) позволять (of) The question admits of no delay. ≈ Вопрос не терпит отлагательства. Syn: allow
1)
6) вмещать( о помещении) The theatre admits only 200 persons. ≈ Этот театр рассчитан только на двести человек.признавать, допускать;
- to * a hypothesis принимать гипотезу;
- to * an assumption сделать допущение;
- to * the truth of the story признавать достоверность рассказа;
- I * it to be true я признаю, что это правда;
- you must * that he is right вы должны признать, что он прав;
- this, I *, was wrong это, надо признаться, было неверно;
- it is generally *ted that... общепризнанно, что... (to) признавать (вину) ;
признаваться, сознаваться (в преступлении) ;
- to * (to) stealing сознаться в краже;
- he *ted to the murder он признался в совершении этого убийства впускать;
допускать;
- to * smb. into the house впустить кого-л. в дом;
- the key *s to the garden это ключ от садовой калитки;
- to * to college принять в колледж;
- this door *s to the dining-room эта дверь ведет в столовую;
- he was *ted to the hospital suffering from burns его взяли в больницу с ожогами;
- children are not *ted детям вход воспрещен;
- he was never *ted into my confidence он никогда не пользовался моим доверием;
- windows * light and air to the room через окна в комнату поступают свет и свежий воздух давать право на вход;
- the ticket *s one это билет на одно лицо, по этому билету может пройти один человек (to) принимать в члены( организации) ;
- to * to the UN принять государство в ООН давать допуск;
предоставлять право на должность или на привилегии;
- to be *ted to the bar получить право адвокатской практики в суде вмещать (обыкн. о помещении) ;
- the hall *s 300 persons этот зал рассчитан на 300 человек;
- the garage door *s two cars abreast в этот гараж могут въехать сразу два автомобиля;
- the harbour *s large liners and cargo boats гавань может приниматть пассажирские лайнеры и грузовые суда( книжное) (of) допускать, позволять;
- it does not * of doubt это не вызывает сомнений;
- it *s of no delay это не терпит отлагательства;
- the words * of no other interpretation эти слова не допускают иного толкования;
- his conduct *s of no complaint на его поведение жаловаться нельзяadmit вмещать (о помещении) ~ вмещать ~ впускать ~ давать допуск ~ допускать, соглашаться;
this, I admit, is true допускаю, что это верно ~ допускать;
принимать;
to be admitted to the bar получить право адвокатской практики в суде ~ допускать ~ допускать;
принимать в члены ~ позволять (of) ;
the question admits of no delay вопрос не терпит отлагательства ~ предоставлять право на должность ~ признавать ~ признавать (факт) ~ признаваться ~ принимать в члены ~ разрешать ~ сознаваться~ допускать;
принимать;
to be admitted to the bar получить право адвокатской практики в суде~ допускать, соглашаться;
this, I admit, is true допускаю, что это верно~ допускать, соглашаться;
this, I admit, is true допускаю, что это верно~ позволять (of) ;
the question admits of no delay вопрос не терпит отлагательства~ допускать, соглашаться;
this, I admit, is true допускаю, что это верно that: ~ pron demonstr. тот, та, то (иногда этот и пр.) ;
this: this wine is better than that это вино лучше того this: this, that and the other то одно, то другое, то третье;
by this к этому времени ~ pron demonstr. (pl these) этот, эта, это this is what I think вот что я думаю ~ pron demonstr. (pl these) этот, эта, это that: take this book and I'll take that one возьмите эту книгу, а я возьму ту ~ pron demonstr. (pl these) этот, эта, это this day сегодня -
5 Philosophy
And what I believe to be more important here is that I find in myself an infinity of ideas of certain things which cannot be assumed to be pure nothingness, even though they may have perhaps no existence outside of my thought. These things are not figments of my imagination, even though it is within my power to think of them or not to think of them; on the contrary, they have their own true and immutable natures. Thus, for example, when I imagine a triangle, even though there may perhaps be no such figure anywhere in the world outside of my thought, nor ever have been, nevertheless the figure cannot help having a certain determinate nature... or essence, which is immutable and eternal, which I have not invented and which does not in any way depend upon my mind. (Descartes, 1951, p. 61)Let us console ourselves for not knowing the possible connections between a spider and the rings of Saturn, and continue to examine what is within our reach. (Voltaire, 1961, p. 144)As modern physics started with the Newtonian revolution, so modern philosophy starts with what one might call the Cartesian Catastrophe. The catastrophe consisted in the splitting up of the world into the realms of matter and mind, and the identification of "mind" with conscious thinking. The result of this identification was the shallow rationalism of l'esprit Cartesien, and an impoverishment of psychology which it took three centuries to remedy even in part. (Koestler, 1964, p. 148)It has been made of late a reproach against natural philosophy that it has struck out on a path of its own, and has separated itself more and more widely from the other sciences which are united by common philological and historical studies. The opposition has, in fact, been long apparent, and seems to me to have grown up mainly under the influence of the Hegelian philosophy, or, at any rate, to have been brought out into more distinct relief by that philosophy.... The sole object of Kant's "Critical Philosophy" was to test the sources and the authority of our knowledge, and to fix a definite scope and standard for the researches of philosophy, as compared with other sciences.... [But Hegel's] "Philosophy of Identity" was bolder. It started with the hypothesis that not only spiritual phenomena, but even the actual world-nature, that is, and man-were the result of an act of thought on the part of a creative mind, similar, it was supposed, in kind to the human mind.... The philosophers accused the scientific men of narrowness; the scientific men retorted that the philosophers were crazy. And so it came about that men of science began to lay some stress on the banishment of all philosophic influences from their work; while some of them, including men of the greatest acuteness, went so far as to condemn philosophy altogether, not merely as useless, but as mischievous dreaming. Thus, it must be confessed, not only were the illegitimate pretensions of the Hegelian system to subordinate to itself all other studies rejected, but no regard was paid to the rightful claims of philosophy, that is, the criticism of the sources of cognition, and the definition of the functions of the intellect. (Helmholz, quoted in Dampier, 1966, pp. 291-292)Philosophy remains true to its classical tradition by renouncing it. (Habermas, 1972, p. 317)I have not attempted... to put forward any grand view of the nature of philosophy; nor do I have any such grand view to put forth if I would. It will be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the history of "howlers" and progress in philosophy as the debunking of howlers. It will also be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the enterprise of putting forward a priori truths about the world.... I see philosophy as a field which has certain central questions, for example, the relation between thought and reality.... It seems obvious that in dealing with these questions philosophers have formulated rival research programs, that they have put forward general hypotheses, and that philosophers within each major research program have modified their hypotheses by trial and error, even if they sometimes refuse to admit that that is what they are doing. To that extent philosophy is a "science." To argue about whether philosophy is a science in any more serious sense seems to me to be hardly a useful occupation.... It does not seem to me important to decide whether science is philosophy or philosophy is science as long as one has a conception of both that makes both essential to a responsible view of the world and of man's place in it. (Putnam, 1975, p. xvii)What can philosophy contribute to solving the problem of the relation [of] mind to body? Twenty years ago, many English-speaking philosophers would have answered: "Nothing beyond an analysis of the various mental concepts." If we seek knowledge of things, they thought, it is to science that we must turn. Philosophy can only cast light upon our concepts of those things.This retreat from things to concepts was not undertaken lightly. Ever since the seventeenth century, the great intellectual fact of our culture has been the incredible expansion of knowledge both in the natural and in the rational sciences (mathematics, logic).The success of science created a crisis in philosophy. What was there for philosophy to do? Hume had already perceived the problem in some degree, and so surely did Kant, but it was not until the twentieth century, with the Vienna Circle and with Wittgenstein, that the difficulty began to weigh heavily. Wittgenstein took the view that philosophy could do no more than strive to undo the intellectual knots it itself had tied, so achieving intellectual release, and even a certain illumination, but no knowledge. A little later, and more optimistically, Ryle saw a positive, if reduced role, for philosophy in mapping the "logical geography" of our concepts: how they stood to each other and how they were to be analyzed....Since that time, however, philosophers in the "analytic" tradition have swung back from Wittgensteinian and even Rylean pessimism to a more traditional conception of the proper role and tasks of philosophy. Many analytic philosophers now would accept the view that the central task of philosophy is to give an account, or at least play a part in giving an account, of the most general nature of things and of man. (Armstrong, 1990, pp. 37-38)8) Philosophy's Evolving Engagement with Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive ScienceIn the beginning, the nature of philosophy's engagement with artificial intelligence and cognitive science was clear enough. The new sciences of the mind were to provide the long-awaited vindication of the most potent dreams of naturalism and materialism. Mind would at last be located firmly within the natural order. We would see in detail how the most perplexing features of the mental realm could be supported by the operations of solely physical laws upon solely physical stuff. Mental causation (the power of, e.g., a belief to cause an action) would emerge as just another species of physical causation. Reasoning would be understood as a kind of automated theorem proving. And the key to both was to be the depiction of the brain as the implementation of multiple higher level programs whose task was to manipulate and transform symbols or representations: inner items with one foot in the physical (they were realized as brain states) and one in the mental (they were bearers of contents, and their physical gymnastics were cleverly designed to respect semantic relationships such as truth preservation). (A. Clark, 1996, p. 1)Socrates of Athens famously declared that "the unexamined life is not worth living," and his motto aptly explains the impulse to philosophize. Taking nothing for granted, philosophy probes and questions the fundamental presuppositions of every area of human inquiry.... [P]art of the job of the philosopher is to keep at a certain critical distance from current doctrines, whether in the sciences or the arts, and to examine instead how the various elements in our world-view clash, or fit together. Some philosophers have tried to incorporate the results of these inquiries into a grand synoptic view of the nature of reality and our human relationship to it. Others have mistrusted system-building, and seen their primary role as one of clarifications, or the removal of obstacles along the road to truth. But all have shared the Socratic vision of using the human intellect to challenge comfortable preconceptions, insisting that every aspect of human theory and practice be subjected to continuing critical scrutiny....Philosophy is, of course, part of a continuing tradition, and there is much to be gained from seeing how that tradition originated and developed. But the principal object of studying the materials in this book is not to pay homage to past genius, but to enrich one's understanding of central problems that are as pressing today as they have always been-problems about knowledge, truth and reality, the nature of the mind, the basis of right action, and the best way to live. These questions help to mark out the territory of philosophy as an academic discipline, but in a wider sense they define the human predicament itself; they will surely continue to be with us for as long as humanity endures. (Cottingham, 1996, pp. xxi-xxii)10) The Distinction between Dionysian Man and Apollonian Man, between Art and Creativity and Reason and Self- ControlIn his study of ancient Greek culture, The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche drew what would become a famous distinction, between the Dionysian spirit, the untamed spirit of art and creativity, and the Apollonian, that of reason and self-control. The story of Greek civilization, and all civilizations, Nietzsche implied, was the gradual victory of Apollonian man, with his desire for control over nature and himself, over Dionysian man, who survives only in myth, poetry, music, and drama. Socrates and Plato had attacked the illusions of art as unreal, and had overturned the delicate cultural balance by valuing only man's critical, rational, and controlling consciousness while denigrating his vital life instincts as irrational and base. The result of this division is "Alexandrian man," the civilized and accomplished Greek citizen of the later ancient world, who is "equipped with the greatest forces of knowledge" but in whom the wellsprings of creativity have dried up. (Herman, 1997, pp. 95-96)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Philosophy
См. также в других словарях:
The Young and the Restless minor characters — The following are characters from the American soap opera The Young and the Restless who are notable for their actions or relationships, but who do not warrant their own articles. Contents 1 Current Characters 1.1 Genevieve … Wikipedia
The Books of Machabees — The Books of Machabees † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Books of Machabees The title of four books, of which the first and second only are regarded by the Church as canonical; the third and fourth, as Protestants (Protestantism) consider … Catholic encyclopedia
The Gunpowder Plot — The Gunpowder Plot † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Gunpowder Plot (Oath taken May, 1604, plot discovered November, 1605). Robert Catesby, the originator of the Powder Plot, owned estates at Lapworth and Ashby St. Legers. His ancient and … Catholic encyclopedia
The Animatrix — DVD Cover Directed by Wachowski brothers Koji Morimoto Shinichiro Watanabe Mahiro Maeda Peter Chung Andy Jones Yoshiaki Kawaji … Wikipedia
The Sacrament of Penance — The Sacrament of Penance † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Sacrament of Penance Penance is a sacrament of the New Law instituted by Christ in which forgiveness of sins committed after baptism is granted through the priest s absolution to… … Catholic encyclopedia
The Blessed Trinity — The Blessed Trinity † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Blessed Trinity This article is divided as follows: I. Dogma of the Trinity; II. Proof of the Doctrine from Scripture; III. Proof of the Doctrine from Tradition;… … Catholic encyclopedia
The Dark Phoenix Saga — Cover of X Men Legends Volume 2: Dark Phoenix Saga (1990), trade paperback collected edition. Art by John Byrne. Publisher Marvel Comics … Wikipedia
The Godfather Part III — Theatrical poster Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Produced by F … Wikipedia
The public scandal of the Dreyfus Affair — The scandal over falsely accused Alfred Dreyfus grew into a public scandal of unprecedented scale. Almost the entire french nation became divided between pro and anti Dreyfusards.Attitude of the pressAgainst this odious campaign was set in motion … Wikipedia
The Rime of the Ancient Mariner — (original: The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere) is the longest major poem by the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge written in 1797–1798 and published in the first edition of Lyrical Ballads (1798). The modern editions use a later revised version… … Wikipedia
The Legend of the Condor Heroes — The Legend of Condor Heroes (zh tsp|t=射鵰英雄傳|s=射雕英雄传|p=shè diāo yīng xióng zhuàn) is one of the most acclaimed wuxia novels by Jinyong, first published in 1957 in Hong Kong Commercial Daily . This is the first novel of the Condor Trilogy . The… … Wikipedia
